Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (1.10 vs 0.50, Δ 0.60).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (15 vs 3 shots).
- Chongqing Tongliang Long was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chongqing Tongliang Long |
|---|---|---|
| 1.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chongqing Tongliang Long |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 586Lead | Accurate passes | 203 |
| 651Lead | Total passes | 271 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chongqing Tongliang Long |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chongqing Tongliang Long |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Chongqing Tongliang Long |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |