Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (2.40 vs 3.20, Δ 0.80).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (21 vs 9 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 2.40 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.20Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 230 | Accurate passes | 409Lead |
| 297 | Total passes | 469Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.