Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (17 vs 16 shots).
- SHANGHAI SIPG was more accurate in front of goal (76% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 4Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 7Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 326Lead | Accurate passes | 313 |
| 403Lead | Total passes | 391 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.