Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (4.05 vs 1.08, Δ 2.97).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (26 vs 8 shots).
- SHANGHAI SIPG was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Nantong Zhiyun |
|---|---|---|
| 4.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.08 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Nantong Zhiyun |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 415Lead | Accurate passes | 179 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 254 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Nantong Zhiyun |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Nantong Zhiyun |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Nantong Zhiyun |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |