Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (3.33 vs 0.38, Δ 2.95).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (35 vs 4 shots).
- SHANGHAI SIPG held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 3.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 26Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 17Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 35Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 472Lead | Accurate passes | 257 |
| 535Lead | Total passes | 338 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.