Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (2.82 vs 0.97, Δ 1.85).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (22 vs 10 shots).
- Wuhan Three Towns was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 2.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 524Lead | Accurate passes | 208 |
| 619Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.