Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (2.46 vs 1.19, Δ 1.27).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (20 vs 11 shots).
- Wuhan Three Towns was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 2.46Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.19 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 414Lead | Accurate passes | 168 |
| 473Lead | Total passes | 252 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shanghai Sipg | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.