Match statistics snapshot
- Sharjah FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.72 vs 0.82, Δ 0.90).
- Sharjah FC fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Nasaf was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sharjah Fc | Statistic | Nasaf |
|---|---|---|
| 1.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sharjah Fc | Statistic | Nasaf |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 431Lead | Accurate passes | 358 |
| 498Lead | Total passes | 426 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sharjah Fc | Statistic | Nasaf |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sharjah Fc | Statistic | Nasaf |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.06 | Goals prevented | -0.06 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sharjah Fc | Statistic | Nasaf |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |