Sheffield Utd vs Birmingham
Key events
View all
Birmingham- T. Bindon
- T. Doyle
- G. Hamer
- P. Bamford
Sheffield UtdFT 3–0
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Model blend
Pre-match outcome blend is not available yet.
Prematch market
No prematch 1X2 odds snapshot available.
Live market
No in-play odds snapshot was captured for this match.
Venue
Bramall Lane
Sheffield · England
- Address
- Bramall Lane
- Surface
- grass
- Capacity
- 32702
Match
Simon Hooper, England
Round 22
- Referee
- Simon Hooper, England
- Round
- Round 22
- Date
Competition
League · England
- Country
- England (GB-ENG)
- Season
- 2025
- Dates
- 2025-08-08 → 2026-05-23
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
66%66%34%34%
Expected goals (xG)
2.8081%0.6519%
Total shots
2074%726%
Shots on target
990%110%
Team form & competition
View all- #13Position
- 60Points
- 18-6-22W-D-L
- 66/66Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 4-0 / 0-3
- Worst defeats
- 1-4 / 5-0
- #10Position
- 64Points
- 17-13-16W-D-L
- 57/56Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 4-0 / 0-2
- Worst defeats
- 1-3 / 3-0
Head to head
View all0Sheffield Utdwins
1Drawsmatches
1Birminghamwins
Recorded meetings: 2 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- Sheffield Utd 0–4 Birmingham
- Sheffield Utd most goals
- Sheffield Utd 1–1 Birmingham
- Birmingham most goals
- Sheffield Utd 0–4 Birmingham
/https%3A%2F%2Fsportsmole-media-prod.s3.gra.io.cloud.ovh.net%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F08%2Fmikel-arteta-13-6a7a3b83e60dd465189253.jpg)
/https%3A%2F%2Fsportsmole-media-prod.s3.gra.io.cloud.ovh.net%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F09%2Fimago1064560171-1-68cab04921bf0944240578.jpg)
Sheffield Utd created the clearer chances on xG (2.80 vs 0.65, Δ 2.15). Sheffield Utd fired more attempts (20 vs 7 shots). Sheffield Utd was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 14%). Sheffield Utd held more of the ball (66% possession).
Birmingham underperformed their xG by 0.7 goals (0 scored vs 0.65 xG).