Match statistics snapshot
- Sheffield Wednesday created the clearer chances on xG (1.56 vs 1.52, Δ 0.04).
- Hull City fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Hull City was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 292 | Accurate passes | 382Lead |
| 382 | Total passes | 460Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.15 | Goals prevented | -0.15 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.