Match statistics snapshot
- Sheffield Wednesday fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 3 |
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 272 | Accurate passes | 285Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 375Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |