Match statistics snapshot
- Sheffield Wednesday created the clearer chances on xG (2.60 vs 0.35, Δ 2.25).
- Sheffield Wednesday fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Sheffield Wednesday was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 57% |
| 292Lead | Accurate passes | 172 |
| 411Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sheffield Wednesday | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |