Match statistics snapshot
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (18% on target vs 0%).
- Dundalk held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6 | Shots off target |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 219 | Accurate passes | 323Lead |
| 303 | Total passes | 415Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.