Match statistics snapshot
- Shelbourne fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (9% on target vs 0%).
- Shelbourne held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 1Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 531Lead | Accurate passes | 296 |
| 612Lead | Total passes | 397 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.