Match statistics snapshot
- Dundalk fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Dundalk was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 33%).
- Shelbourne held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 409Lead | Accurate passes | 195 |
| 505Lead | Total passes | 293 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |