Match statistics snapshot
- Dundalk fired more attempts (8 vs 6 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
| 6 | Total shots |
| 8Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Additional tracked metrics for this fixture.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Free Kicks | 12Lead |