Match statistics snapshot
- Shamrock Rovers fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 18%).
- Shamrock Rovers held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 302 | Accurate passes | 402Lead |
| 406 | Total passes | 506Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.