Match statistics snapshot
- Shamrock Rovers fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 38%).
- Shamrock Rovers held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 172 | Accurate passes | 478Lead |
| 252 | Total passes | 571Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |