Match statistics snapshot
- Shamrock Rovers fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (83% on target vs 9%).
- Shamrock Rovers held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 290 | Accurate passes | 317Lead |
| 385 | Total passes | 409Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.