Match statistics snapshot
- Shamrock Rovers created the clearer chances on xG (0.49 vs 1.46, Δ 0.97).
- Shamrock Rovers fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Shamrock Rovers held more of the ball (75% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 0.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.46Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | Ball possession | 75%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 190 | Accurate passes | 699Lead |
| 254 | Total passes | 769Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -1.29 | Goals prevented | -1.29 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |