Match statistics snapshot
- Shelbourne fired more attempts (19 vs 7 shots).
- Shelbourne held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Sligo Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Sligo Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 521Lead | Accurate passes | 186 |
| 625Lead | Total passes | 291 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Sligo Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Sligo Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Sligo Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |