Match statistics snapshot
- Shelbourne fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- UCD was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 28%).
- Shelbourne held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Ucd |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Ucd |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 489Lead | Accurate passes | 144 |
| 589Lead | Total passes | 243 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Ucd |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Ucd |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Ucd |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |