Match statistics snapshot
- Shelbourne fired more attempts (20 vs 11 shots).
- Shelbourne held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 400Lead | Accurate passes | 205 |
| 497Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.