Match statistics snapshot
- Shelbourne fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Shelbourne held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 364Lead | Accurate passes | 210 |
| 472Lead | Total passes | 298 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.