Match statistics snapshot
- Shelbourne fired more attempts (27 vs 11 shots).
- Shelbourne held more of the ball (76% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 12Lead | Shots off target |
| 6 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 76%Lead | Ball possession | 24% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 548Lead | Accurate passes | 127 |
| 631Lead | Total passes | 208 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shelbourne | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |