Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City fired more attempts (18 vs 4 shots).
- Shenzhen Ruby FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- Chengdu Better City held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 218 | Accurate passes | 349Lead |
| 289 | Total passes | 411Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.