Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (20 vs 2 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 0%).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 12Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 180 | Accurate passes | 530Lead |
| 245 | Total passes | 591Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.