Match statistics snapshot
- Shenzhen Ruby FC fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Shenzhen Ruby FC was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 22%).
- Shenzhen Ruby FC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 299Lead | Accurate passes | 256 |
| 396Lead | Total passes | 347 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.