Match statistics snapshot
- Qingdao Jonoon fired more attempts (20 vs 6 shots).
- Shenzhen Ruby FC was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 15%).
- Shenzhen Ruby FC held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 14Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 470Lead | Total passes | 296 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.