Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (25 vs 13 shots).
- Shenzhen Ruby FC was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 28%).
- Wuhan Three Towns held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 13Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 25Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 198 | Accurate passes | 479Lead |
| 269 | Total passes | 542Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shenzhen Ruby Fc | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.