Match statistics snapshot
- Avispa Fukuoka created the clearer chances on xG (0.39 vs 0.42, Δ 0.03).
- Avispa Fukuoka was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 13%).
- Shimizu S-pulse held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 0.39 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 306Lead | Accurate passes | 215 |
| 410Lead | Total passes | 318 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |