Match statistics snapshot
- Shimizu S-pulse created the clearer chances on xG (1.36 vs 0.99, Δ 0.37).
- Shimizu S-pulse fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- Fagiano Okayama was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 1.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.99 |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 355Lead | Accurate passes | 190 |
| 472Lead | Total passes | 285 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Fagiano Okayama |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |