Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (0.24 vs 2.09, Δ 1.85).
- Nagoya Grampus fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 0.24 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.09Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 405Lead | Accurate passes | 378 |
| 492Lead | Total passes | 464 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shimizu S-pulse | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.