Match statistics snapshot
- Barnet created the clearer chances on xG (0.65 vs 1.60, Δ 0.95).
- Barnet fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- Barnet was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Shrewsbury | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Shrewsbury | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 23% | Ball possession | 77%Lead |
| 46% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 74 | Accurate passes | 492Lead |
| 160 | Total passes | 563Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Shrewsbury | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Shrewsbury | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Shrewsbury | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |