Match statistics snapshot
- Sibenik created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 0.75, Δ 0.24).
- Sibenik fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- HNK Gorica was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Hnk Gorica |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Hnk Gorica |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 345Lead | Accurate passes | 183 |
| 448Lead | Total passes | 282 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Hnk Gorica |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Hnk Gorica |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Hnk Gorica |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.