Match statistics snapshot
- Sibenik created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 1.29, Δ 0.19).
- Sibenik fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Sibenik was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Hnk Rijeka |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.29 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Hnk Rijeka |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 221Lead | Accurate passes | 206 |
| 315Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Hnk Rijeka |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Hnk Rijeka |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Hnk Rijeka |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.