Match statistics snapshot
- Sibenik created the clearer chances on xG (2.16 vs 1.14, Δ 1.02).
- Sibenik fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Sibenik was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Nk Osijek |
|---|---|---|
| 2.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Nk Osijek |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 186 | Accurate passes | 315Lead |
| 268 | Total passes | 414Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Nk Osijek |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Nk Osijek |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sibenik | Statistic | Nk Osijek |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.