Match statistics snapshot
- Sirius created the clearer chances on xG (1.64 vs 0.68, Δ 0.96).
- Degerfors IF fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sirius | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 1.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sirius | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 411Lead | Accurate passes | 344 |
| 487Lead | Total passes | 431 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sirius | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sirius | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sirius | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |