Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 1.58, Δ 0.08).
- Sirius fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- Sirius was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sirius | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sirius | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 361Lead | Accurate passes | 354 |
| 435Lead | Total passes | 415 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sirius | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sirius | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sirius | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |