Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF created the clearer chances on xG (0.58 vs 1.89, Δ 1.31).
- Hammarby FF fired more attempts (20 vs 10 shots).
- Hammarby FF was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sirius | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 0.58 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.89Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sirius | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 327 | Accurate passes | 511Lead |
| 397 | Total passes | 587Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sirius | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sirius | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sirius | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |