Match statistics snapshot
- IFK Goteborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 2.17, Δ 0.57).
- IFK Goteborg fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Sirius was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sirius | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.17Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sirius | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 266 | Accurate passes | 435Lead |
| 331 | Total passes | 496Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sirius | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sirius | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sirius | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.