Match statistics snapshot
- KRC Genk II fired more attempts (19 vs 12 shots).
- SK Beveren was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 26%).
- SK Beveren held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sk Beveren | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sk Beveren | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 378Lead | Accurate passes | 315 |
| 461Lead | Total passes | 401 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sk Beveren | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sk Beveren | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sk Beveren | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.