Match statistics snapshot
- Komárno created the clearer chances on xG (0.51 vs 1.17, Δ 0.66).
- Komárno fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Skalica was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 12%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Skalica | Statistic | Komárno |
|---|---|---|
| 0.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Skalica | Statistic | Komárno |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 54% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 134 | Accurate passes | 316Lead |
| 250 | Total passes | 440Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Skalica | Statistic | Komárno |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Skalica | Statistic | Komárno |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Skalica | Statistic | Komárno |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.