Match statistics snapshot
- Žilina created the clearer chances on xG (1.10 vs 3.94, Δ 2.84).
- Žilina fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Žilina was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Skalica | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
| 1.10 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.94Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Skalica | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 59% | Pass accuracy | 69%Lead |
| 142 | Accurate passes | 230Lead |
| 241 | Total passes | 333Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Skalica | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Skalica | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Skalica | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.