Match statistics snapshot
- Degerfors IF created the clearer chances on xG (0.09 vs 0.91, Δ 0.82).
- Degerfors IF fired more attempts (14 vs 1 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Skövde Aik | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 0.09 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91Lead |
| 7 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Skövde Aik | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 491Lead | Total passes | 330 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Skövde Aik | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Skövde Aik | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Skövde Aik | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.