Match statistics snapshot
- Osters IF created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 2.83, Δ 1.74).
- Osters IF fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- Skövde AIK was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Skövde Aik | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.83Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Skövde Aik | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 125 | Accurate passes | 391Lead |
| 171 | Total passes | 442Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Skövde Aik | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Skövde Aik | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Skövde Aik | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.