Match statistics snapshot
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 278 | Accurate passes | 320Lead |
| 402 | Total passes | 432Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.