Match statistics snapshot
- Sligo Rovers fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 14%).
- Sligo Rovers held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 318Lead | Accurate passes | 217 |
| 428Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.