Match statistics snapshot
- Sligo Rovers fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 13%).
- Sligo Rovers held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 360Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 473Lead | Total passes | 384 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.