Match statistics snapshot
- Shelbourne fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 0%).
- Shelbourne held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 352 | Accurate passes | 426Lead |
| 436 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.